This blog is dedicated to exposing the lies about creditwrench promoted by a debt collector's blog who calls himself "CREDITWRENCHSCAM" and is also known as "Enormis", "Enormis Debtor", "Uncle Normie" and any other false screen name he can think of.

Judgment vacated with prejudice

More from the braying jackass But where is his proof that Bill Bauer ever said any of the things he claims that were said. All he does is bray away.

Judgment vacated with prejudice?

No such legal principle exists as vacating a judgment with prejudice. However, CREDITWRENCH has stated that it does.

When a judgment is vacated, the case is simply reopened. And, futher litigation is allowed to proceed. Just because a judgment is vacated, does not stop another judgment from being rendered in the same case, regardless of the reason the prior judgment was vacated.

CREDITWRENCH stating that a judgment can be vacated with prejudice is false and misleading.

posted by

The problem with what the jackass claims is that the only difference is that one way the plaintiff could file again and with prejudice the plaintiff could not refile. Once the judgment has been vacated very few plaintiffs ever refile their cases. In some situations they won't because the Statute of Limitations has run it's course.

As usual, debt collectors just gotta spout off about a bunch of crap.